From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 5 18:07:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674CE1065670 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mail.gmx.com (unknown [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2EA98FC12 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Aug 2009 18:07:06 -0000 Received: from ipa78.68.107.79.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.23.10]) [79.107.68.78] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu002) with SMTP; 05 Aug 2009 20:07:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/QUZkLMYbQhRL6oObqyIAJyL9FxSpf8S3QfI3d8u 5mPK/0ViACybJt Message-ID: <4A79CA3C.9050302@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:06:52 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arctic@alkar.net References: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793F2F9@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <1249493435.3092.45.camel@Father> <4A79C44D.8040803@gmx.com> <1249495034.3092.58.camel@Father> In-Reply-To: <1249495034.3092.58.camel@Father> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 Cc: Gary Gatten , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: Network card Intel and 802.1P tag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:07:08 -0000 Andrey O.Sokolov wrote: > I tried both variant on both NIC - fxp and em > The result doesn't change ;( You should post to net@ and maybe the maintainer will help you. Include pciconf. >> Perhaps off topic, but why are you interested in priority >> tags, since FreeBSD will silently ignore them? > > I developing QoS-model for big network. > I have casualy found out this problem, when I analyzed the traffic with > different COS-value from various devices. Yes, but at the end of the day FreeBSD will ignore the priority tag. It would be just cosmetic. But, I agree that you should see the correct priority tag. Nikos