From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 12 21:31:16 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA22689 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:31:16 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA22669 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:31:14 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA14211; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:31:12 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id GAA20093 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:31:11 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id GAA06378 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:06:44 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199506130406.GAA06378@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: CVS and FreeBSD 2.0.5/2.1/2.2 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:06:44 +0200 (MET DST) Reply-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-current users) In-Reply-To: <199506121841.LAA02608@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 12, 95 11:41:40 am Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 880 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > [2.1-stable] > Not ``random internet users'', there have been many requests for > something between RELEASE and CURRENT. Stable will be basically > the last release + critical bug fixes. 2.1 is going to be 2.0.5R > + what ever CRITICAL bug fixes David gets done between now and > when he says it is done. Does this mean that we should pass any and all 2.1 bug fixed through David (or someone else), or are we allowed to performa ``obvious'' fixes ourselves until a final XXX-freeze date is reached? I don't think of trying to break the 2.1 tree, but i'm afraid it will be too much work for the `who' who has to approve all fixes. Perhaps this is also time to add a Branch: field to our commit logs. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)