Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:06:44 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: CVS and FreeBSD 2.0.5/2.1/2.2 Message-ID: <199506130406.GAA06378@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199506121841.LAA02608@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 12, 95 11:41:40 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > [2.1-stable] > Not ``random internet users'', there have been many requests for > something between RELEASE and CURRENT. Stable will be basically > the last release + critical bug fixes. 2.1 is going to be 2.0.5R > + what ever CRITICAL bug fixes David gets done between now and > when he says it is done. Does this mean that we should pass any and all 2.1 bug fixed through David (or someone else), or are we allowed to performa ``obvious'' fixes ourselves until a final XXX-freeze date is reached? I don't think of trying to break the 2.1 tree, but i'm afraid it will be too much work for the `who' who has to approve all fixes. Perhaps this is also time to add a Branch: field to our commit logs. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506130406.GAA06378>