From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 13:36:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DBE1065693 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3968FC12 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:36:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <4CCD70D5.4080201@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:36:21 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <4CCD69C7.5000300@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <4CCD69C7.5000300@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: mount_smbfs problem after upgrade Samba 3.4 -> 3.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:36:25 -0000 On 10/31/10 14:06, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to > the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a > remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs: > > mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo@mars/inter /home/mnt > Password: > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error > > Samba server log says: > mbd/sesssetup.c:1703(reply_sesssetup_and_X) > reply_sesssetup_and_X: Attempted encrypted session setup without negprot > denied! > > > smbclient works fine and so does connecting to the shares from Windows > and Konqerour like "smb://192.168.1.8/". > > Anybody on the list with enough knowledge of Samba that could take a > shot at this? Apparently something changed between version 3.4 and 3.5 > of Samba. > > Thanks! Just noted another post from yesterday, same issue: "Issue wit Samba 3.5.6 and Mac OS X 10.5" I've filed a bug report to see if the maintainer could have a look.