Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Nov 1995 16:54:48 +0100 (MET)
From:      hm@altona.hamburg.com (Hellmuth Michaelis)
To:        bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, hm@altona.hamburg.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp
Subject:   Re: DELAY's in syscons
Message-ID:  <m0tGpbM-00001PC@ernie.altona.hamburg.com>
In-Reply-To: <199511181324.AAA25738@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Nov 19, 95 00:24:23 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From the keyboard of Bruce Evans:

> >> DELAY(n) only delays n-20 usec on an infinitely fast machine so it
> 
> >If not told otherwise, pcvt does NOT use DELAY() for exactly the reason
> >you just describe.
> 
> >Instead it uses dummy reads from port 0x84 which execute in a defined time
> >of ~= 1,25us. (IF they ever do execute - i was told that some implementations
> >do know that there is nothing to read from port 0x84 and somehow don't let
> >this read though to the bus, the result is, that these reads do execute very
> >fast).
> 
> I think this only works reliably for 8MHz ISA buses.

Exactly - it works on ISA and EISA machines but not necessarily on PCI.

hellmuth
-- 
Hellmuth Michaelis           hm@altona.hamburg.com              Hamburg, Europe
                                              (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nstall BSD ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0tGpbM-00001PC>