From nobody Thu Dec 18 15:36:12 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dXFBS0FMbz6LBSw for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dXFBR00Xxz3j4V for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm1 header.b=FaKSo7Sj; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b="um/rItxr"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.157 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926BF140016D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:36:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:36:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1766072174; x=1766158574; bh=LvG8p7gLYB Hxr7f15VTkk6ISDDh+OrmgjweY3noEZ3s=; b=FaKSo7Sj3ZcrdtJpGvDwrTz8YF rjZFy7n6fAqqrgoaBsGA4ypzhDoqM9AoHdWKgVVoefE89GHkE1jF8qVKScwoRpWz NHoDSwqioYmPDlpqgHCOVgU4ImRsxj+RhIIfSmo+CCjz44wbH+vSrUOcUymGgP/N Z5d37DT5RcCLYCPScZphAO6fP+j+68zMXX5bFqYpOXnaPKdddl+CHXu1lk2Unza9 oQsIecw8ubudNtQpO5GkbQlHXNolgzCizFzeAuoCn3tcR3sea48JxF0aAif64xeQ 36bwG6xUw2VKamHXwbJBdacMq25UD1+FqrJE3kcLyxqVa1bdiepSOg8LQXSg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1766072174; x=1766158574; bh=LvG8p7gLYBHxr7f15VTkk6ISDDh+Ormgjwe Y3noEZ3s=; b=um/rItxr3i6+cwTfqVcfcjkkXwacrullOPXq0q2IeIrLDlJfxne 46IlAVrN9WlN3kxYQTYT5+S8W0yfGmiesyhUltzXxQmN/XFw0Al+EQz/eRfy545z LEZc/vYfmLnZgteKdaRwZewHj3sLQf2Ci0o7hXgc3J2S71eHCdH8lB0OpU3esKVB 6lGl/4Ww72VTZHQtdIsUnKdO+6kkDydO39P0gIVFpTYwTGfy3mTgYKvSsQuVzAtP Igr5ZmwaxoAELMu/AxeCvM3YP/ZZa3Ec1X6+hBlRoC6LUE1bEwdwny5EUh9z0Wkq x0R6x2xvlHuKo5WfU42cE1nG+BTrvkOZoYQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdegheektdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdortddttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgv rhhnpeduleejfeethfejffefffeghfevueekheefffejteevvdevjeeujeeivefgfedthf enucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmpdhnsggprhgtph htthhopedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhp khhgsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:36:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:36:12 +0000 From: void To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere complains of duplicate dependencies when processing portslist [known 10 day or so bad status of ports tree] Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27:c]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.157:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4dXFBR00Xxz3j4V On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 07:26:36AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >Note: > >729666 does not seem to be a commit hash prefix from the main >branch. It is not handy to figure out what commit corresponds >to a "--first-parent --count for merge-base" number, if that >is what it is. dev-commits-ports-main and the likes of >https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/log/ are not set up for lookups >based on such. If it is such a number, an "n" prefix might be >appropriate. Hi, yeah it's n. % doas git -C /usr/ports rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD 729666 % doas git -C /usr/ports log -n 1 HEAD | egrep commit commit 271f3fe6c9e633af2d11f4412ad85c8377bc2d10 --