From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Feb 23 18:10:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA18077 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 18:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA18061; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 18:10:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA23576; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 18:06:06 -0800 (PST) cc: Charles Henrich , mpp@freefall.freebsd.org (Mike Pritchard), henrich@msu.edu, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/2692 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Feb 1997 16:50:53 PST." <15806.856745453@time.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 18:06:06 -0800 Message-ID: <23572.856749966@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Actually, never mind - Mike's already committed the fix. :-) > > this is bogus! On half of my systems I get three thousand lines everytime th > e > > damn thing runs, obscuring the daily reports. There should be a way to tel l > > find to shut the hell up. Its not an "illegal" filename, because you can > > create (anyone can create it!) on the filesystm. > > I don't like it either, but what do you suggest instead? Did you adopt > the `-ls' flag suggested by Guido? If so, was it acceptable? If not, > do you have another compromise to suggest? :-) > > Jordan