From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 27 04:59:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA20420 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 04:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.ucb.crimea.ua (relay.ucb.crimea.ua [194.93.177.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA20414 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by relay.ucb.crimea.ua (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA10787; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 14:58:56 +0300 (EEST) From: Ruslan Ermilov Message-Id: <199709271158.OAA10787@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Subject: Re: protocol for CVSup? In-Reply-To: from Alfred Perlstein at "Sep 27, 97 07:18:50 am" To: perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu (Alfred Perlstein) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 14:58:56 +0300 (EEST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-My-Interests: Unix,Oracle,Networking X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Once Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > i'm running NATd so i can have more than one machine operating on only one > IP address, but i think it is causing breakage with CVSup... > > does anyone know what ports and what type of traffic i have to have > tunneled to the machine running cvsup? > CVSup can operate in four modes: active, passive, multiplexed and SOCKS. In your situation you can use either passive or multiplexed modes. See man cvsup (-P option). -- Ruslan A. Ermilov System Administrator ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank +380-652-247647 Simferopol, Crimea 2426679 ICQ Network, UIN