From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 5 11:38:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fdy2.demon.co.uk (fdy2.demon.co.uk [194.222.102.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3799A14EC6 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:38:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk) Received: (from rjs@localhost) by fdy2.demon.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00550; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:32:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjs) Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:32:47 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199904051432.PAA00550@fdy2.demon.co.uk> From: Robert Swindells To: imp@harmony.village.org Cc: chuckr@mat.net, obrien@NUXI.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199904041903.NAA82653@harmony.village.org> (message from Warner Losh on Sun, 04 Apr 1999 13:03:13 -0600) Subject: Re: gdb 4.17 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: >In message Chuck Robey writes: >: You know what you're doing, but I want to suggest that perhaps you want >: to run that archs part past Warner, who recently (boy, I hope it was >: Warner, I think it was) added the MIPS stuff into the tree, and is >: pretty strongly in favor of making cross-compilation possible. >Yes. I added support to our binutils to generate mips binaries. I >think that if other groups want their port in the tree, that should be >the first step, with the second making egcs work for the port. I hope >to have that done in the next couple of weeks. The only other two >architectures that I think there'd be support for would be sparc and >arm. I would vote for including sparc and arm as well. I'm getting a SparcStation next month and want to get either a SA1100/SA1101 evaluation board or a Chaltech motherboard for work. Robert Swindells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message