From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 3 21:18:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C472106566C for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 21:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036448FC16 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 21:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C61EB918; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:18:24 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Mike Tancsa Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:18:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p17; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201208031418.57941.jhb@freebsd.org> <201208031539.47735.jhb@freebsd.org> <501C37D3.5040704@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <501C37D3.5040704@sentex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208031718.07569.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:18:24 -0400 (EDT) Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add locking to twe(4) so it no longer uses Giant X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 21:18:25 -0000 On Friday, August 03, 2012 4:42:59 pm Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 8/3/2012 3:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Friday, August 03, 2012 2:56:00 pm Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> I'll try to find time to try it later today, but I'm in the middle of > >> budget wrangling and I can't make any promises. > >> > >> Before I try, will these patches apply to the twe driver in > >> 9.1-PRERELEASE? My system with twe was updated to RELENG_9 on July 18. > >> I really don't have time to install current right now. > > > > I believe the patches should apply fine on 8 and 9. If you use it on 8 or 9 > > please make sure to enable INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT at least for > > initial testing. Thanks! > > Seems to apply to RELENG_9 just fine. Are there any stress tests you > suggest I run that might expose some bugs ? The machine is not > production yet, so its ok to crash it. Probably pho's stress2 stuff. Thinks like dbench might be a good start as well for initial testing. -- John Baldwin