From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Apr 6 2:32: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCE914BD2 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 02:31:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id CAA82605; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 02:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 02:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904060930.CAA82605@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: misc/10972: NTPv$ 92e fails to buuild on stable-3.1 past 3/31 CVSup Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/10972; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Poul-Henning Kamp To: krowett@rowett.org Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/10972: NTPv$ 92e fails to buuild on stable-3.1 past 3/31 CVSup Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 11:29:33 +0200 I'm aware of this one, and have it on my list. I'm not convinced that ntptime doesn't need a heavy-handed rewrite to face the new nanokernel stuff correctly. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message