From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 21 08:37:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA01780 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 08:37:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shadow.worldbank.org (shadow.worldbank.org [138.220.104.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA01775 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 08:37:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adhir@worldbank.org) Received: from localhost (adhir@localhost) by shadow.worldbank.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA18225 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:37:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from adhir@worldbank.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shadow.worldbank.org: adhir owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:37:13 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alok K. Dhir" To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Vinum vs CCD? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi - I recently stumbled accross the existence of vinum in 3.0, and have a couple of simple questions: 1. How does vinum compare to CCD, specifically with regards to performance and stability? 2. Is anyone using Vinum on an SMP -current box with any horror/success stories? Thanks! Al To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message