Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 15:52:42 -0700 (MST) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com> To: bofh@terranova.net (Travis Mikalson) Cc: ugen@undp.org, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Revision E Message-ID: <199811102252.PAA12482@panzer.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: <3648958F.9C5C03CE@terranova.net> from Travis Mikalson at "Nov 10, 98 02:35:43 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Travis Mikalson wrote... > Ugen Antsilevitch wrote: > > > > Heh...i asked this question in here this morning actually:) I think this is > > probably what i have - > > it's dell and it has AHA-2940UW. I tried to use with with 2.2.7-stable and > > it didn't work:) > > Let's see if you get any better answers:) > > --Ugen > > Oh as far as I know they work just fine until you put load on them.. > then they spew timeout errors. > At least that's been my experience with the Rev. E chipset 2940s with > either 2.2 or 3.0 as of about 6 months ago (pre-CAM) I believe the Rev. E 2940's (with Rev B 7880's) work fine now, in both -stable (non-CAM) and current. Justin fixed the problem months ago. (June, I think) > A dual channel AHA-2940 would be a 3940 which uses a different and > unsupported chipset (the 7895 I believe) unless you either patch CAM > into 2.2 or use 3.0 which now uses CAM. > Although I wouldn't put 3.0 into immediate production without testing it > out thoroughly it would be easier for you to install than trying to get > a CAM-patched 2.2 working. There is a 2.2-CAM release available. It's about the same vintage as 2.2.7. It's here: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/development/cam/2.2CAM-19980716-SNAP/ Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811102252.PAA12482>