From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 20:49:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B2916A4CE; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:49:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027E543D53; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i72KnoEA088591; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:49:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)i72Kno39088590; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:49:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])i72Kkovo029386; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:46:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200408022046.i72Kkovo029386@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:04:53 +0200." Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 21:46:50 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha mem.c src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC src/sys/alpha/include memdev.h src/sys/amd64/amd64 io.c mem.c src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC NOTES src/sys/amd64/include iodev.h memdev.h src/sys/conf NOTES files files.alpha files.amd64 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:49:52 -0000 =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > Was your /dev/mem as-a-module commit tested? Since I and others can't > > build a kernel without "device mem" I don't see how this could be tested. > > UP kernels work fine, only SMP kernels are broken. AHA! That is a useful data point. Thanks! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH