From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 05:53:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD062CDA for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37571A0D for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.235]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EEAD560119 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w7.hushmail.com [65.39.178.32]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D526D200F5; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:23:27 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:23:27 -0500 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Beagle recommendations for real From: chump1@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20140103052327.D526D200F5@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 05:53:48 -0000 I have been toying with my Raspberry Pi for a while now, stuck with Linux thus far. I need to make another pass at FreeBSD on the Pi but between reports of NetBSD bugs and struggles, I cannot help but wonder, perhaps the Beagle products are a little more solid for BSD use. Certainly they have a lot more I/O options than the Pi as well. Could someone with some experience please share? Also I am a little confused by the Beagle product line, it looks like the Bone and Bone Black are both superior to the original, yet the original continues to be sold at a higher price. Is that correct or am I missing something? Thanks! Sent using Hushmail