Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:38:00 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: U1E and U2 are supported system? Message-ID: <p06002075bd56b960b319@[10.0.1.3]> In-Reply-To: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 5:57 AM +0900 2004-08-29, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> If so, I would like to move U1E and U2E to the "Fully Supported Systems"
> section. I do not know about E3500 and E4500, but they use a different
> controller chip?
This is truly funny. The entire reason I subscribed to this
mailing list just a few minutes ago is that I got an U2 last night,
and I wanted to try to install FreeBSD on it. I read the exact same
section you quoted, and was disappointed to think that I'd have to
install OpenBSD, NetBSD, or Solaris instead.
So, are U1E and U2 now actually supported with the on-board SCSI
controller?
--
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002075bd56b960b319>