From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 19:44:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C570D16A4A6; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3088A43D49; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NJhCuF076592; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NJhBCa076591; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:43:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: vonnegut.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Boris Samorodov In-Reply-To: <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4" Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:45 -0000 --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:07 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: >=20 > > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbos= e > > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri update= d > > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current >=20 > There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. >=20 > > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? >=20 > Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux > X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on > XFree86-4.4.0. OK, I checked what FC4 has, and their big xorg RPM is 6.8.2 and contains DRI drivers. However, I don't think we want to use FC4's, not just because of the size of the RPM, but also because the drivers are likely to be too stale. The DRI driver <-> DDX interface breaks backwards compat much more often than the DRI <-> DRM interface (which in theory never breaks). So, we really want some fresh Mesa 6.4.2+ DRI drivers, which we can't get from FC4. So, that means someone needs to get a linux box with suitable glibc again and roll their own like I used to, probably. Or maybe steal binaries from some other distro. Suggestions? --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEnEQ9HUdvYGzw6vcRAvIyAJ9cis1UUtqMpHwHzhMx+vPiACYrrgCdFTkx cQwycxdw5AFv+luTpU6TZh4= =cdBK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4--