From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jan 17 12:48:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from sapphire.looksharp.net (mcdouga9.user.msu.edu [35.10.148.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2DD14E37 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:48:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by sapphire.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA72154; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:48:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) X-Authentication-Warning: sapphire.looksharp.net: bsdx owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:48:19 -0500 (EST) From: Adam To: Omachonu Ogali Cc: Will Andrews , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Parent Logging Patch for sh(1) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I haven't looked at it but it sounds like something useful to me. On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Omachonu Ogali wrote: > I thought it would benefit those who are security minded. Why shouldn't I > have posted it? > > Omachonu Ogali > Intranova Networking Group > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > > > On 16-Jan-00 Omachonu Ogali wrote: > > > After applied, sh(1) will log the parent process ID and name that executed > > > it into syslog. Available from > > > http://tribune.intranova.net/archives/sh-log.patch > > > > Is there any (valid) reason why you posted this here? > > > > -- > > Will Andrews > > GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- > > ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ > > G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message