From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 6 20:38:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11B4106564A for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from gsicomp.on.ca (gsicomp.on.ca [200.46.208.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A118FC19 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A6BFCB284; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gsicomp.on.ca ([200.46.208.251]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51384-06; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes (CPE002129cfd480-CM001ac3584898.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.236.129.198]) by gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 2719BFCB21B; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1CFF44A938424168BE9293D9115BA74C@hermes> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Randal L. Schwartz" , "FreeBSD Mailing List" References: <86fwwjyurd.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:38:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 Cc: Subject: Re: Like it or not, Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted softwarein the core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:38:10 -0000 > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/178267 > > And yes, there it is, in > /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/hardware/hwsleep.c: > > * 4.3. Licensee shall not export, either directly or indirectly, any of > this > * software or system incorporating such software without first obtaining > any > * required license or other approval from the U. S. Department of Commerce > or > * any other agency or department of the United States Government. In the > > > So, is such approval on file with the FreeBSD Foundation? More to the point - we probably need to be doing what our Linux brethren have been doing - holding out for a more compatibly-licenced version of the ACPICA code. >From http://www.acpica.org/overview.php ACPICA is written in ANSI C, and can be generated under many different 32-bit and 64-bit OS development environments. Source code packages are provided for the following environments: Microsoft Windows* and UNIX*. 1) The Windows package includes Visual C++* project files and other ACPI utilities that run under Windows. 2) The UNIX package has a format and licensing suitable for inclusion by commercial OS vendors. There is no Linux* source code package since ACPICA updates for Linux are provided periodically in patch form. The ACPICA subsystem is modified to integrate smoothly with the Linux kernel source. This includes conversion of the ACPICA source code to the Linux kernel coding standard, and licensing under the GNU General Public License. Seems like the FSF needs to work on a BSD-compatible licence for this code too. Regards, -- Matt Emmerton