From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 28 02:44:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA19896 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:44:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from obiwan.aceonline.com.au (obiwan.aceonline.com.au [203.103.90.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA19858 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:43:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by obiwan.aceonline.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA00312; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 00:45:53 +0800 (WST) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 00:45:52 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd To: Philippe Regnauld cc: Ade Barkah , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uptime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Philippe Regnauld wrote: > No :-( Actually, I get to a point (with BSDish systems) where I'm > more amazed by the reliability of the local power company than > that of the OS -- I really get surprised when the OS fails :-) > hehe. :) I seem to remember a bug (feature? :) in Linux systems that took them down at (around) a certain uptime *grin* Anyone confirm / deny this? Cya. Adrian.