From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 01:02:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DBA1065676 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB13F8FC0C for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 88978 invoked by uid 2001); 13 Dec 2008 00:42:51 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:42:51 -0600 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: Palle Girgensohn Message-ID: <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <493ACAC4.5020806@linuxbox.com> <12501719@bb.ipt.ru> <493D898C.1030609@linuxbox.com> <22B6C509EF7C4AB0A2D8350C31BB8D5D@valentine> <57098597@bb.ipt.ru> <26695644@bb.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Alec Kloss , freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, "Jason C. Wells" , Derrick J Brashear Subject: Re: OpenAFS on FreeBSD Progress (Works) X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:02:58 -0000 On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:34:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > >Replying to myself. Seems I found out why this port may be needed: > >Both server and client have common files (i.e. should be marked > >as have CONFLICTS and can't be installed with each other). > > You don't need a meta port, you a client and a server port, and let the > client install all common files, and let the server depend on the client, > which is reasonable anyway. I think you have that backwards. The client contains a kernel module. The server is all run in userland. I think in this case, have the client depend upon the server and have the server install all common files. I agree that there should not be a metaport. -- Rick C. Petty