Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 09:31:34 -0500 From: "J.D. Bronson" <jbronson@wixb.com> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp issues...but WHY Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.2.20040504092942.0245ebe0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200405040724.09537.kstewart@owt.com> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20040504071343.024331b8@localhost> <200405040635.03640.kstewart@owt.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20040504091427.02457290@localhost> <200405040724.09537.kstewart@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:24 AM 05/04/2004, Kent Stewart wrote: > > >Kent > > > > How are these not different networks? Could you explain? > > What would I need to do to MAKE then different? > > > >They are on the same cable or wire. So, you only have one network. For >example, on this computer, I have a 192.168.x.x network and a >207.41.x.x network. The 207. network is hooked up to my DSL modem >switch and the 192. network is connected to a different switch. All of >my local computers are hooked up to this network. They are physically >different networks. > >You have two logically different IP addresses but they are on the same >network. > >Kent ahh..NOW I understand. thanks. If I got a switch for the 192 block machines and a switch for the 10 block machines that would be 2 distinct networks...right? Next question.. Then how do I get data from one segment to the other w/o using a router and yet at the same time keeping 'arp' happy ? Thanks again for all your help! -JDB
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.0.6.2.20040504092942.0245ebe0>