From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 22 12:32:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8692016A4CE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:32:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.telecom.by (mail.telecom.by [213.184.225.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E09043D1D for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:27:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barzog@telecom.by) Received: from ADMIN1 (barzog.telecom.by [172.16.2.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.telecom.by (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9MCMFLa000780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:22:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from barzog@telecom.by) Message-ID: <004e01c4b831$c317c640$0c0210ac@ADMIN1> From: "Oleg Gawriloff" To: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:22:13 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on martin.telecom.by Subject: Re: decreasing interrupt CPU load X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:32:14 -0000 Hello! >if that's the only issue, then preventing one from compiling with both SMP >and DEVICE_POLLING doesn't seem necesary, since you can turn polling on >and off at runtime with sysctl's. As I stated in my first letter it seems that polling on SMP w 4.10 is not working as expected. At least with i82550 chipset. With best regards, Oleg Gawriloff.