From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 17 05:44:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA15198 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 05:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veda.is (root@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA15193; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 05:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09783; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 12:41:11 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199606171241.MAA09783@veda.is> Subject: Re: review: ftpget final source To: peter@spinner.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 12:41:09 +0000 (GMT) Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jmz@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199606170859.QAA00412@spinner.DIALix.COM> from Peter Wemm at "Jun 17, 96 04:59:46 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Not meaning to rain on the parade, but I think ftpget is a bad name now... > One port (squid) installs /usr/local/bin/ftpget, and I dread the confusion > that this may cause.... > > Also, since it does both ftp and http fetches, ftpget is an increasingly > inappropriate name.. Could we rename it to something like (say) netget.. > (I know, that's a boring and uninspiring name...) 'fetch' seems to fit, and is easier to pronounce. -- Adam David