Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:11:12 -0400 From: Mark Thomas <thomas@pbegames.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stable Documentation Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010816210805.02033110@pbegames.com> In-Reply-To: <20010816205922.C44611@databits.net> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010816203531.02031b40@pbegames.com> <OF7251C682.F902E9BE-ON88256AAB.0001402A@wr.usgs.gov> <OF7251C682.F902E9BE-ON88256AAB.0001402A@wr.usgs.gov> <20010816202125.A44611@databits.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20010816203531.02031b40@pbegames.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:59 PM 8/16/01 -0400, Pete Fritchman wrote: >++ 16/08/01 20:37 -0400 - Mark Thomas: >| I think this is a screwed up definition in /etc/defaults/make.conf, which >| claims NO_X should be defined to turn off XWindows support. I ran into the >| same issue with emacs (running overnight, so I ended up with X when I >| didn't want it). WITHOUT_X11 seems to be what the ports expect. > >Above all the NO_X/NO_* options, it says: > ># To avoid building various parts of the base system: > >So, I think this is fine. (as NO_X works for /usr/src/ stuff) Doesn't it make sense to have them combined into one? If you build your system without X, you probably don't want the ports to try and build it either. Is WITHOUT_X11 documented anywhere? grep didn't find it anywhere in /usr/share/doc/handbook. Mark --- thomas@pbegames.com -------------> http://www.pbegames.com/~thomas Play by Electron Games ----------> http://www.pbegames.com [TM4463-ORG] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20010816210805.02033110>