From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep 23 10:55:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA10181
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA10156
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA00653; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeremy Prior <jez@netcraft.co.uk>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD's Current Mailing List)
Subject: Re: ncheck and a multi-lingual fsck 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Sep 1996 18:12:49 BST."
             <199609231712.SAA10123@server.netcraft.co.uk> 
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:54:50 -0700
Message-ID: <651.843501290@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  3. go the whole way and submit it as part of a general `cleanup', where
>     each of the fs-dependent programs (fsck, ncheck, ...) are called by
>     an fs-independent parent (I'd use mount(8) as the template).

This idea, I like! :)

					Jordan