From owner-freebsd-ipfw Thu Jul 25 2: 6:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE2837B400 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 02:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skynet.stack.nl (insgate.stack.nl [131.155.140.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C5843E3B for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010:202:b3ff:fe17:9e1a]) by skynet.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5054011; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id E045498D2; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:06:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:06:36 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ipfw behaviour with non IPv4 packets Message-ID: <20020725090636.GA39394@stack.nl> References: <20020725001652.A94913@iguana.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020725001652.A94913@iguana.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I am a bit uncertain on what is the best path, but i believe a > reasonable one is to assume > > "ip" = "any" --> any IP packet (v4 or v6) > > and similarly > > "proto" --> any packet of protocol "proto" over IP (v4 or v6) > > Comments ? Wouldn't that break backward compatibility with IPFW1 ? Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message