From owner-cvs-all Thu Jul 8 16: 2: 5 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 664) id 694651552A; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 16:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 16:02:02 -0700 From: David O'Brien To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , Sheldon Hearn , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux-base-5.2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <19990708160201.B46260@hub.freebsd.org> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <6514.931435144@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <3784953E.20F2005E@scc.nl> <19990708114649.A67400@dragon.nuxi.com> <19990708175759.A28155@mad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <19990708175759.A28155@mad>; from Tim Vanderhoek on Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 05:57:59PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > You may want to diverge from David's suggestion a little and name one > of them without a version number and distribution ("RH", for RedHat > being the current distribution) to signify which port is the current > reccomended one. How can one be reccomended over the other? StarOffice4 requires libc5 (ie, RH5.1) compatability, whereas StarOffice5 requires glibc2 (ie, RH6.0/RH5.2) compatability? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message