Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:39:47 -0700 From: "Brandon Harper" <lists-inet@booms.net> To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus] Message-ID: <NHELLMIEFPEHAFGOIAGFKEMIDHAA.lists-inet@booms.net> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20011030124022.04487620@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Just to followup, the daily dat file seems to be working fine. > Anyone out > there using it on a regular basis, I would be interested in hearing your > experiences. > > ---Mike > Mike-- I'm also using UVScan and know that my definition files are getting updated daily via cron, and it hasn't been catching these latest virii either. I also had someone privately e-mail me who said it wasn't working for them either yesterday. I'm using version 4.x, and have the latest dat file: bash-2.04# ls -la dat*.* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2222080 Oct 23 21:15 dat-4167.tar bash-2.04# ls -la scan.dat -rwxr--r-- 1 root wheel 1543967 Oct 23 22:15 scan.dat It did however catch a W95.Hybris.gen message yesterday (the haha@sexyfun.net worm), so the problem seems to be related to the definitions for UVScan itself. - Brandon <!-- http://www.booms.net --> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NHELLMIEFPEHAFGOIAGFKEMIDHAA.lists-inet>