From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jan 15 10:03:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C397CA51E5 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:03:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341741E4D for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:03:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id j15so86410294oih.2 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:03:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0Rn1Rp1m1se9OGMWxz1bXnA0z+2W89sxQ9u2bH/mKqY=; b=UF2tUfJT6ncZTl40FSNqLFehfh4YLzGzVR2+F12+HoWEn2gf7ovqSD94n4d5SIR7m2 h17DDLnVAAzyQCIh5+mW0ti5XkklzbJbk1O41vPif3T9iMr2efAlh6dRO3IHOMgt3X3u uSZGaC5jdVXNAy+IyfcdtwcAtfP/gdCXNgIXo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0Rn1Rp1m1se9OGMWxz1bXnA0z+2W89sxQ9u2bH/mKqY=; b=oFr1YkTVsJNUFxhdIIQoCcUiFUy4UUiuLBCPZX3lJl6kzoAsseH/3dC7I9Lj2r3ei/ S1dUJ+nf2xa6853gLRfhoyQZx8qKztYHZu6oPVIQLbZdK2/NAe+5ix2Iedtl0KvsJP0t PqwezlUVdPvG6NHxqmAGOap6/K1VxtvAPlmsLeq8wE8wRByovkT1Z01gsfKcD8f6ef1t KI0JtLdUxx79GUG/SzeCkLX/MULNhWJIViCTJTdzCBG0NpoQCFz6pGxAf13ahnplz3Gt 2TLUJxrPNwO/Pk1rHGVzybjSECiMcyYUW/PN27o1Mh+KJqO/qUR4fZXoO8i59fuv/Uqj zTBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLU2crzHF+sHySOnDMKoEziAEBTDUx4rJjpHd1YId6kyxsON/DwsxV62BhdYNx+WhNtT676FVLp8Lis1A== X-Received: by 10.202.175.68 with SMTP id y65mr15028869oie.187.1484474596500; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:03:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.23.208 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:03:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1773236257.20170115123252@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1773236257.20170115123252@serebryakov.spb.ru> From: Kevin Bowling Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 03:03:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_10Gb_on_budged_with_fiber_=E2=80=94_what_should_IP_cho?= =?UTF-8?Q?ose=3F?= To: Lev Serebryakov Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:03:17 -0000 Intel is overpriced and still riding their Ethernet reputation from well over a decade ago with little to show for it. I would recommend cxgbe anything, so Chelsio T420 and up. The T520-SO-CR is within reason for demanding home office/small office users to purchase new and I've deployed over a thousand of these at work with flawless performance. T420 are a bit cheaper on i.e. US ebay if that is viable to you but not by too much. I bought a T420-BT that way for home use and have no complaints. For non-TOE use at 10g, the difference between T4 and T5 doesn't matter too much, pcie 2.0 vs 3.0. You can use DAC twinax cables to connect 10G SFP+ ports together. This will save several watts of power and heat on each side vs 10G Base-T. Sometimes DACs have interop problems, usually with switches. Optics are more forgiving, although again the switch side may have extra hoops like approved vendors. As far as a switch, I got a good deal on the beta UniFi version of https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgeswitch-16-xg/ for my home network. Now that it is full price, I would recommend the EdgeMax version unless you have other UniFi gear. They are inexpensive as far as the physical connectivity versus the rest of the market but not quite cheap yet. These aren't exactly pro grade, the interop seems pretty poor in general, but that's the price you pay for the price you didn't pay :) Regards, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello Freebsd-net, > > I want to attach my DIY-NAS (FreeBSD-based) to my desktop (Windows-based) > with 10Gb link. I could not afford 10Gb switch for sure. So, it will be > point-to-point connection only for my desktop and not other computers in > my > house. > > Also, I could not use my current twisted pair wiring, as I need > connection > to router for my desktop too :) Cable ducts ion my house is overcrouded, > so, I think only fiber is way to go, there is no chance to add CAT6 cable > between my room and storage room with server, and copper SFP-to-SFP > patchcord is out of question! > > So, I need cheap PCIe cards with SFP+ slots which is not very picky about > modules (I'm on budget!), with good FreeBSD support and drivers for > Win'10 (which is another problem with very old cards). > > What should I choose? There are A LOT of old 10Gb cards on eBay. Should I > choose Mellanox ConnectiX-2? Chelsio-T3? Something else? Intel X520 looks > as safe variant, but it is much more expensive and, as far as I know, it > supports only expensive branded SFP+ modules, too. > > > P.S. You could never stop upgrading your home NAS. > > -- > Best regards, > Lev mailto:lev@serebryakov.spb.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >