From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 11 11:10:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079F2B1E for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BB61D7E for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26831 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2013 12:28:37 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Feb 2013 12:28:37 -0000 Message-ID: <5118D1B5.9070409@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:45 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option References: <201301221511.02496.jhb@freebsd.org> <50FF06AD.402@networx.ch> <061B4EA5-6A93-48A0-A269-C2C3A3C7E77C@lakerest.net> <201302060746.43736.jhb@freebsd.org> <511292C9.4040307@mu.org> <51166019.9040104@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <51166019.9040104@mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randall Stewart , John Baldwin , net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:10:48 -0000 On 09.02.2013 15:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > However, the end result must be far different than what has occurred so far. > > If the code was deemed unacceptable for general inclusion, then we must find a way to provide a > light framework to accomplish the needs of the community member. We've got pluggable congestion control modules thanks to lstewart. You can implement any non-standard congestion control method by adding your own module. They can be compiled into the kernel or loaded as KLD. I consider implementing this as a CC module the correct approach instead of adding yet another sysctl. Doing a CC module like this is very easy. -- Andre