Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:36:11 -0600 From: Eric Schuele <e.schuele@computer.org> To: rapopp@eastcentral.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.x and disklabel Message-ID: <4547C1CB.4000708@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <200610301205.06693.rapopp@eastcentral.edu> References: <200610301205.06693.rapopp@eastcentral.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/30/06 12:05, Reuben A. Popp wrote: > Good morning everyone, > > Recently, we've been looking at purchasing a SAN here and I came across this > site while doing some research. Seeing as how we just met with reps from > Apple to discuss their offerings, I thought that the article was well worth > reading ;) > > http://www.mostlygeek.com/node/39 > > Anyway, I realize that the article deals with the 5.x branch, so it may not > be 100% exact when it comes to our implementation (6.x). The article makes > note that as of 5.x, there were many parts that were still 32 bit, which in > turn affected the maximum filesystem size (~2TB). > If you haven't already gotten an answer.... The following may help: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html > Not that we would need a filesystem larger than that, but does anyone know if > this is still an issue, or was it changed in 6.x, or if there are plans to > rework it in -CURRENT? > > TIA :) > Reuben A. Popp > -- Regards, Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4547C1CB.4000708>