From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 15:54:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AEB10656CE; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8778FC21; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n13FrsbN035824; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:53:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n13Frs01035823; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:53:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:53:54 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Garance A Drosehn Message-ID: <20090203155354.GC33520@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Garance A Drosehn , "M. Warner Losh" , arch@FreeBSD.org References: <20090130.085130.-4349483.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090130.093052.-2022808221.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090202220628.GA76833@dragon.NUXI.org> <20090202.154213.387237162.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:54:02 -0000 On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:06:40PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > It looks like the extra output assumes that each target is > producing just a single line of output. That's pretty much what > I expected would happen, and if so then the extra output doesn't > really help all that much when it comes to debugging 'make -j'. No, there's a bug in our make. NetBSD's make gives the correct output. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)