Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:20:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/39127 Message-ID: <200206102120.g5ALK5x34665@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/39127; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD Bugs <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ports/39127 Date: 10 Jun 2002 16:15:29 -0500 On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 16:11, Alan E wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 02:10:03PM -0700, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >The following reply was made to PR ports/39127; it has been noted by GNATS. > > > >From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> > >To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > >Cc: > >Subject: ports/39127 > >Date: 10 Jun 2002 16:06:17 -0500 > > > > Hmm. I did a portupgrade -aRr -L log- -l conslog > > to do my upgrade. Which of [uf] would have forced wrapper to be > > upgraded? > > the -f to "force" the rebuild/reinstallation of a package that does > not need to be updated. > > I think we can close this PR now, right? Yup. But doesn't that force ALL ports to be upgraded/re-done ? With 251 ports installed, that could be much. Wouldn't it be better to have wrapper in the dependency chain (optionally) for XFree86-4-Server? > -- > AlanE -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206102120.g5ALK5x34665>