Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:45:19 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imaptools distinfo Message-ID: <4E9118CF.7060304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E8AF399.1060601@FreeBSD.org> References: <201110031305.p93D5K3x082695@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E8A0449.1020303@FreeBSD.org> <4E8AF399.1060601@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/04/2011 04:52, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > On 2011.10.03. 20:51, Doug Barton wrote: >> Confirming with the author is fine, but did you compare the old and new >> distfiles yourself? If so, what changed? > > Don't take my comment personally, I just picked this particular mail to > reply to. I have never understood why such issues have been taken so > seriously. Imo, if the author confirms the change that should be enough. That sounds great in theory, but how do you know that it was really the author who answered? I don't want to go too far down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole, but diff'ing the old and new distfiles is the way to be sure. > If we had audited the initial port and each new upgrade, That should be done regardless. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9118CF.7060304>