From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 16 17:54:51 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E187A9B8
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755D21127
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e4so1739235wiv.10
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:54:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=1RnJajBtkE+onqKS/W9HIwdhShOlJ7DL738XfLJGI9Y=;
 b=dvqBrxDPbOidP8RGrNmor3kqozQivGvSUmaDp3jvykRZxnlGVOPzh3OC+TZk3Nbioy
 mJ2I1OYvK1HyrWQ8oQAqx5b6zzZcU8JDNqifmW0fJM54K2jj7kg/9G4UR1d9ySL1tgDB
 MbdRPRHjD0s1VTDZ2veh6Wl/mI+I9EODOVXY7aYdfTeKYCRo7lB9ssTlRdGAzcxtCj3m
 04LKfncE5s7u3XIOWHaHSu77yZtUh9uD34u+XMhoAgnp4z65NeXG+RSEyW7dUKxVPVq7
 GP/ZxGy48EGflpWfqK8f5bE5fQLwyJeuVl4NmN1YxFhbIY9rOICpQZ8Oqy/SdFEQQnvr
 bLJQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.11.233 with SMTP id t9mr9775721wib.1.1392573288693;
 Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (4e5670d1.skybroadband.com. [78.86.112.209])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 ci4sm30105764wjc.21.2014.02.16.09.54.47 for <ports@freebsd.org>
 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:54:46 +0000
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why would a port use its own existence as an excuse to fail
 install?
Message-ID: <20140216175446.02ea5d8f@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140216041454.GA46095@over-yonder.net>
References: <20140216033119.GR22007@albert.catwhisker.org>
 <20140216034822.GK2304@over-yonder.net>
 <20140216041454.GA46095@over-yonder.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:54:51 -0000

On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:14:54 -0600
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:


> A nice thing about portmaster is that it's smarter than portupgrade.
> ...
> In this case, I'd guess, portmaster ... Which fails, since it's
> already installed, thus...

For me portupgrade did that upgrade perfectly even though I forgot to
read UPDATING. pkg check reports no errors.