From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 7 21:56: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from noc.demon.net (server.noc.demon.net [193.195.224.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570EA154A4 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 21:56:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fanf@demon.net) Received: by noc.demon.net; id FAA03830; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 05:56:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.83) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma003808; Thu, 8 Jul 99 05:55:57 +0100 Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 3.02 #13) id 1126E3-0001fB-00 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Jul 1999 05:55:59 +0100 To: hackers@freebsd.org From: Tony Finch Subject: Re: Berkeley DB question In-Reply-To: <199907072028.NAA21795@monk.via.net> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 05:55:59 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG User Joe wrote: > >Is the berkeley db (or any other small db) multi user safe? Are there >locks to maintain coherency of multiple processes access the same database files? The web pages for Berkeley DB 2 claim that it does (note version 2, not 1.85 as shipped with FreeBSD). http://www.sleepycat.com/. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message