From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 00:53:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C15106566B; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Alexander Motin Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:53:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1236802980.00085518.1236789602@10.7.7.3> <49BEE5BC.30703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49BEE5BC.30703@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200903162053.28614.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:53:36 -0000 On Monday 16 March 2009 07:50 pm, Alexander Motin wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in next > > few days unless a showstopper is found or "over-my-dead-body" > > type of review is received. ;-) > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim > > > > and here: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about the > > patch. > > Have just retested this with just updated 8-CURRENT. Still works > fine as before with my Acer TM6292 > (Core2Duo+i965GM+ICH8M+bge+iwn+sdhci amd64 SMP). Writing this > letter just after successful resume. > > There is still some DRI resume problems (will try one rnoland@ > patch tomorrow) and my touch pad does not wakes up for some reason, > but that is probably unrelated. I went ahead and committed slightly different version. Please resync the source if you tested the old version. Cheers, Jung-uk Kim