From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Nov 22 21:16:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E52DF5EED for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 21:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.wilcox-tech.com [45.32.83.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.wilcox-tech.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDA66A5D4 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 21:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: (qmail 21156 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2017 21:16:23 -0000 Received: from 107-131-85-28.lightspeed.tulsok.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.78?) (awilcox@wilcox-tech.com@107.131.85.28) by mail.wilcox-tech.com with ESMTPA; 22 Nov 2017 21:16:23 -0000 Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) References: <5A15DDFA.8060302@Wilcox-Tech.com> To: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" From: "A. Wilcox" X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5A15E921.8000007@Wilcox-Tech.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:16:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FmSlNbXx2Xsm7w9ttJQlSDIWFiDfRonDS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 21:16:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --FmSlNbXx2Xsm7w9ttJQlSDIWFiDfRonDS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/11/17 14:44, Warner Losh wrote: > If there is no political agenda, then moving the entire thing to a = port > would have been the right thing to do =E2=80=93 including the datfi= les. >=20 >=20 > No. That would also give the project's endorsement to it. Gone is 'no > opinion at all' we have. And *since* you have decided that "having a port" implies endorsement of a project, before I archive this thread, here are a few more ports that you should probably poke portmaster about: # Mention of BDSM (BSDM?) and "sexy" outfits devel/py-leather # Depicts realistic situations involving stealing property games/narcissu2 # More potentially offensive phrases games/sex # Useless anyway if fortune(1) is removed misc/fortune-* # FreeBSD is endorsing one religion over the other misc/bibletime misc/brs misc/sword # The INSULTS configuration option security/sudo # Supporting a murderer sysutils/progsreiserfs --=20 A. Wilcox (awilfox) Open-source programmer (C, C++, Python) https://code.foxkit.us/u/awilfox/ --FmSlNbXx2Xsm7w9ttJQlSDIWFiDfRonDS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaFekhAAoJEMspy1GSK50U4NAQAI9gfTALOS1KF6YoYob4kYvu SyyiGgjUQ3nROURWsxP8WrwE71fIj93/qthm1AnhWjvYAyzqxWNumb7vxP5KG9Sx jVnlSodVPUVrc3ZfIXGtJRKzxEahx1ncls9mdmfv0Zk1zAJpaByEL7FTDS0KTDSx lJSRoddhR+Z4EzVEkD31qJxmpm8y6zmvt43Cmnisce/NWHNiY8ezg3AjBs6LzOwV CUvsQYRm4Y1+x02fyEskVU2zlxe6WAu6oUJjp/6DihRMxOoYEXGtmfbdtdTiLyO5 4dGbLeC3qXAdrbddposWaz0nVk5LzHvKnngoPS2ivU4mT6OYCJSv+LVnFzTXntJU YYTDWNWPPBznmzW2lj1RaXmiwfQjx6VIIvEFwrchO3byyXvgXgGgIRblPl+G2KIo leDYcjYDJ9AbcmvMj+bQ5FH4w5QH2jzruRMbAv3dZiDpp6bSrkKj32xYMyh83UVu mpgypBCtMMVMZk8tIAyQWksebYKriaoA9fGau1BXcYqicP8MOdRwVh627DarLqCt j4W+PxqTQIpGZV/1Xj3rAVgcHOPX5lVBRn74dU+9v60puRHa4r0KZwOIaY5mBLjw POx/xFqq+5NxgZfssXYeN2SOGD8XbwBWfs98mYei53GVOqO5CUL6qGGuYSRAoovM rPTKSxwgeaO3qUyHbhbC =Yu0Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FmSlNbXx2Xsm7w9ttJQlSDIWFiDfRonDS--