From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 26 10:50:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles519.castles.com [208.214.165.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678AC15D2B for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:50:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA02712; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:42:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199908261742.KAA02712@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Matthew Dillon , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:57:00 -0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:42:01 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > However, dt suggested I make VFS_CHECKEXP a VOP instead of VFS, my only > gripe is that exportability is determined by the filesystem, _then_ the > vnode, making it more of a VFS op imo. I think dt is right here; the issue is that the operation is performed on a vnode, not on a filesystem, and thus it's a VOP not a VFSOP. > Btw, are you planning on attending any BAFUG coming up? I'd love to hear > some of the preliminary stuff you are proposing for the filesystem. There's one tonight in Berkeley. Be there. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message