From owner-freebsd-security Sun Jul 19 21:31:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA19302 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sun, 19 Jul 1998 21:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from destiny.erols.com (root@destiny.erols.com [207.96.73.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA19297 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 1998 21:31:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdowdal@destiny.erols.com) Received: from destiny.erols.com (someone@destiny.erols.com [207.96.73.65]) by destiny.erols.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA27609; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:30:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:30:56 -0400 (EDT) From: John Dowdal To: Brett Glass cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , dg@root.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The 99,999-bug question: Why can you execute from the stack? In-Reply-To: <199807200140.TAA06705@lariat.lariat.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 19 Jul 1998, Brett Glass wrote: > At 06:17 PM 7/19/98 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > As a seasoned assembly language programmer, I understand the subjects > of memory allocation and "thunking" quite well. I don't think anyone > should feel antagonized when I emphasize the importance of fixing this > problem -- especially after the extensive personal cost it has had, and > will have, for me. As a seasoned assembly language programmer, you should understand the subject of "backup" quite well. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message