Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:11:19 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is pkg quarterly really needed? Message-ID: <20170420171119.GJ74780@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <99a57878-ae39-d2a4-fe35-023dae8b320b@gjunka.com> References: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com> <CALfReyctL3vTt756oyh1ZTf%2BkgpAOHwp_SUZQCFQiZDccFNMow@mail.gmail.com> <ljhffcphq3bqr8dk2lrlld11ola28b7gqp@4ax.com> <29e44642-e301-f07c-afe3-bad735d8ee5e@freebsd.org> <20170420053722.GD31559@lonesome.com> <b9d24938-5502-cc69-30ed-1941c2517849@gjunka.com> <20170420084452.GH74780@home.opsec.eu> <99a57878-ae39-d2a4-fe35-023dae8b320b@gjunka.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > Fine, but would that be a good approach? Doesn't it look more like a > process change than a code change? For me, it does not look like a process-change only. I haven't thought through all the details, I'm going with my intuition here (because thinking it through takes a long time). One number: I made approx. 40 commits to quarterly trees in 2 years, and broke it one least once, probably more often. Go to https://secure.freshbsd.org/search?committer=pi and then limit the view to the 8 quarterlies and check those commits. It might as well be my sloppiness, but... > Surely, some code would need to be > changed but then again, wouldn't that be mostly configuration? My gut feeling says it's more than a little change and a bit of configuration. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170420171119.GJ74780>