From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 22:50:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8930216A420; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:50:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from viefep19-int.chello.at (viefep11-int.chello.at [213.46.255.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6FB43D48; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:50:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (really [80.98.231.227]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20060220225050.XANH19801.viefep19-int.chello.at@[192.168.2.186]>; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:50:50 +0100 Message-ID: <43FA47C9.4010701@t-hosting.hu> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:50:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jesus R. Camou" References: <200602202244.k1KMiNFR063191@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200602202244.k1KMiNFR063191@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/java-tomcat Makefile article.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:50:54 -0000 Jesus R. Camou wrote: >jcamou 2006-02-20 22:44:23 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Removed files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/java-tomcat Makefile article.sgml > Log: > Remove java-tomcat article: > > This article has been `out of shape' for quite > some time now. The idea of removing it has been > discussed with some committers and contributors > and we all came to the conclusion that it could > be removed. Quoting keramida@: > > ``Keeping out of date docs around is sometimes > worse that not having documentation at all'' > > This article is no longer relevant. > > Requested by: lawrance (docs/93039) > No objections: -doc > Approved by: trhodes (mentor) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.7 +0 -21 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/java-tomcat/Makefile (dead) > 1.28 +0 -615 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/java-tomcat/article.sgml (dead) > > I think the 5-roadmap article is also quite outdated since 5.5 will be the last 5.X release, and this article covers the problems and plans that existed about the time 5.0 was released. What do you think about removing it, too? Gabor Kovesdan