From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  5 14:33:07 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418F337B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 May 2003 14:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D808943FAF
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 May 2003 14:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h45LX4Lr046564
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 23:33:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: arch@freebsd.org
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 May 2003 14:28:08 PDT."
             <200305052128.h45LS8Zk011878@repoman.freebsd.org> 
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:33:04 +0200
Message-ID: <46563.1052170384@critter.freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin Makefile src/sbin/bsdlabel Makefile 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 21:33:07 -0000


With reference to the commit below, we need to decide our strategy
with such disk maintenance tools.

Do we compile&install only what is used for the current platform ?

Do we compile&install all tools on all platforms ?

I don't particularly care one way or the other.

The intent is that the tools work on all platforms, but since we
don't cross-build boot-code, there is some natural limits to their
usefulness.

For make [cross-]release, we can build the necessary tools as release
tools, so that does not necesarily factor in this discussion.

Poul-Henning

In message <200305052128.h45LS8Zk011878@repoman.freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp
 writes:
>phk         2003/05/05 14:28:08 PDT
>
>  FreeBSD src repository
>
>  Modified files:
>    sbin                 Makefile 
>    sbin/bsdlabel        Makefile 
>  Log:
>  Compile bsdlabel on all platforms.
>  
>  Install a link to the disklabel(8) name on i386 and alpha platforms.
>  
>  Leave old disklabel(8) sources intact but disconnected from the build
>  for now.
>  
>  Revision  Changes    Path
>  1.120     +1 -6      src/sbin/Makefile
>  1.15      +10 -0     src/sbin/bsdlabel/Makefile
>

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.