From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 14 14:41:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA01098 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:41:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA01091 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:41:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 22036 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Oct 1998 21:41:20 +0000 (GMT) To: jeff-ml@mountin.net Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installation probs w/3.0-BETA In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:07:46 -0500" References: <3.0.3.32.19981014160746.0105f178@207.227.119.2> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 23:41:20 +0200 Message-ID: <22034.908401280@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > True, but how many actually do install parity memory in their servers, let Everybody who cares about their data? > alone workstations. Had I waited one week longer for a 128MB DIMM, the > price dropped enough to where I would have paid the same for parity. Not a > server, which should have parity, but paying 50% more for a workstation... I take ECC memory for granted in servers, and that's what I've installed in all my servers. The only exception being my first Pentium server which had a 430FX chipset and couldn't use parity/ECC. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message