From owner-freebsd-doc  Tue Apr  4  9:33:11 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB6E37BACA
	for <doc@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Apr 2000 09:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 12cWEt-000NrL-00; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 18:31:39 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: J McKitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: rough doc patch 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2000 14:23:22 +0100."
             <20000404142322.A7059@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> 
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 18:31:39 +0200
Message-ID: <91718.954865899@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org



On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 14:23:22 +0100, J McKitrick wrote:

> Note to new users:  Do not be misled.  While staying up to date via
> cvsup is simple, upgrading across major revisions is not.  Due to
> major changes between revisions, the procedure may become decidedly
> more complex.

I think this is excellent, especially the bit that says that binary
upgrades are preferred.  In fact, I'd like for that bit to be emphasized
(bold or whatever).

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message