From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 14:27:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4199C16A419 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cokane@freebsd.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [63.240.77.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB0E13C458 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cokane@freebsd.org) Received: from discordia (c-75-69-212-227.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[75.69.212.227]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <2007083014162501500pddq5e>; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:16:26 +0000 Received: by discordia (Postfix, from userid 103) id B6BC319F576; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:16:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr1 (2007-02-13) on discordia X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr1 Received: from [172.20.1.3] (erwin.int.cokane.org [172.20.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by discordia (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAB017B672 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:16:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46D6D0F8.3080700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:15:20 -0400 From: Coleman Kane Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070813) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: AIGLX, ATI/AMD Radeons and FreeBSD -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: cokane@FreeBSD.org List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:27:37 -0000 Hi, I am curious what the state of AIGLX is using the ATI R300+ cards (I've an rv350) under FreeBSD. I have been trying to track down what work is being done on the problem. I see a number of references detailing that it *is* broken, but I am having difficulty tracking down any progress or unofficial patches to deal with fixing it... is there anybody who's actively working on fixing this problem? I found PR 112984: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112984 which documents some spotty working/not working cases... all referencing 6.2-STABLE. Is this the only progress made so far? Is there any "working solution" under -current (or does the -stable fix apply to -current too)? Does the xorg-server-snap get better results? I'm hoping that someone else has already trudged through here and can help shortcut what may be a drawn-out compile/test/debug/recompile cycle... -- Coleman Kane