From owner-cvs-ports Thu Jul 31 04:19:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA29459 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from access.sfc.wide.ad.jp (bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.139.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA29451; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by access.sfc.wide.ad.jp (8.8.6/3.5Wpl107/15/97) with ESMTP id UAA01617; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 20:17:30 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199707311117.UAA01617@access.sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/german - Imported sources From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 31 Jul 1997 02:32:18 -0700 (PDT)" References: <199707310932.CAA19800@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 00 D8 2C CA C7 75 D4 40 5C 34 39 BA A5 46 C0 CC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 20:17:30 +0900 Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > asami 1997/07/31 02:32:18 PDT > ports/german - Imported sources > Update of /home/ncvs/ports/german > In directory freefall.freebsd.org:/c/asami/tmp/german > Log Message: > A new "german" category starts today in a rather embarrasing fashion. > (Basically because spinne's authors can't be bothered to translate the > documents to English.) However, that doesn't mean we can put more > useful German-specific stuff here, so all *.de porters, rise to your > feet! :) Speaking of language specific ports, I've been thinking that adding two letter country code defined in ISO3166 to PKGNAME isn't right. As the name suggests, these codes are representing name of countries, not languages. Since we are making *language specific* categories, I think using language code is more appropriate. So, instead of using ISO3166 codes, I suggest we change our convention to use code defined by RFC1766. Any opinion? Cheers, Max