From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 10 11:29:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA07374 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:29:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA07368 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:29:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA10682 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 14:25:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199902101925.OAA10682@misha.cisco.com> Subject: Re: umount -f In-Reply-To: <14595.918673475@brown.pfcs.com> from Harlan Stenn at "Feb 10, 1999 02:04:35 pm" To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 14:25:06 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL52 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Just to ask, have you run lsof on /phosphorus to see if it is, > indeed, busy? lsof is unable to stat /phosphorus, of course. But, in any case, this should not be relevant, because the `-f' is specified... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message