From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Jul 9 00:35:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16251DA6044 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com (mail-wr0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8FA271376 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c11so92826830wrc.3 for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 17:35:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=eWAZnA9jzz/d/Y0U3GScMuqBrtPFsJ2SfuYgGl40V4g=; b=CDcyWtoZI4N1ETyvWmP6REYx1ro4C3EfhFVEPVSMcfDnL184hWtSCqwzMPqwBwvZn1 6tHCocbgYvC8BkSMxQ2MrmwEtszx/XOSA810IDInU+UDYiXrnuYmoeoXQ4vFgWPEIc9W n1uLhMxEuaDXZXdKb5UoXIL0xyjcXqqYoOLz/38UPhgKPqzRkgXaVTRQXf0sd2garV+/ TaNpF5BLlwk6+cwGHH1RMzWJHHTx7hbrJDlwrkhIVTZoFfhiwtrtZc9mLq1upiqxMxvz H0g9yCzjjklkKKAEkX9a0lSSy7zkGHIf46eWFif5978QrOf9eO1/NM3dYJIEEw9mRkGR pgrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=eWAZnA9jzz/d/Y0U3GScMuqBrtPFsJ2SfuYgGl40V4g=; b=FFc7IS4o/9e/z6e+AyQuXMnJt0Y/SJeUIytfVR9jfcptqyuZvpntgTTKaLqog7T0K1 AFAE0I02A3JTViF94b4MHyaQ4iqckxFUdSCwFrs7pdxhPe5qQKtwdTpRExzhnLZSPEpi wTGlSoPs4P6/cAdo9q4HhKUfitXQbaaaWW3JaXVYsr8PQS6n+pU0rSBjLMYOfxZFZo8c SRCYLTRuRP5svjnQpcpwUuEhGFqUpvC2azK2bDWbguI8W5eMr3Rv4h5j6+olhBjgZh31 DEb5a6K6PE0gvvo6TpaS3G6TfUuGyvDglXKvKGokdj1zyPjwY462b+mMOtIFhGox8+jA 95cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113Sqtsl94uYpzu5W+9UH42bPL3jlCiBGT7uhL4olEGyx6Wnumrs FYOR8RfYyMgbkk34q6I= X-Received: by 10.80.152.22 with SMTP id g22mr6813366edb.38.1499560527801; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 17:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a03f:a53:ef01:e159:fee9:735f:d088? ([2a02:a03f:a53:ef01:e159:fee9:735f:d088]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y53sm3878614edd.4.2017.07.08.17.35.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Jul 2017 17:35:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Sydney Meyer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: VirtualBox outbound networking Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:35:26 +0200 References: <201707090012.v690CSwI055681@mail.karels.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <201707090012.v690CSwI055681@mail.karels.net> Message-Id: <57DAD930-7160-4F8B-AA68-CFD34E5A50F5@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 00:35:30 -0000 Yes, same here. Bridging is working as it should, including ICMP of = course. On Windows, i wouldn't even be able to manually add a route, so that one = is out for me too:) I found several posts about NAT-related problems with VirtualBox. I read = vb is using "slirp" for it's NAT implementation, because of portability, = which appears to do crazy things to ICMP messages, but, obviously, i = dont know this for sure. But it doesn't appear to be a problem with FreeBSD or the RC's itself, = so i will ask around some VirtualBox users or @freebsd-virtualization.. > On 9. Jul 2017, at 02:12, Mike Karels wrote: >=20 >> Mea Cupla, i guess.. I can confirm that both, NAT and bridged = networking, are indeed working fine on 11.1-RC1 too. The "problem" = appears to be "only" with ICMP and the way VirtualBox implements NAT, = i.e. TCP and UDP work fine. A post from last month stated bridged = networking on 11.1 BETA1 onwards wouldn't work either, that i can = confirm is working fine, at least here and as far as i can see. >=20 >> Mike, can your vbox guests send ICMP messages beyond their gateway on = 10.3 or is this known behaviour? >=20 > Yes, I can ping beyond the default gateway. But I realized after I = set > the last response, I am using bridging and not NAT. Don't want to use > Windows routing :-)! >=20 > Mike